0 Comments
Lead Quality and Scoring: Can it bring about world peace or at least will sales like marketing more?
Anytime marketing delivers leads to sales, there seems to be an age old conflict where sales complains that the marketing leads are not good enough and marketing says sales is not working the marketing leads hard enough, or at all. In sales' defense, and I hate defending sales, marketing does collect a lot of leads, often from any response to a web form, and throws the leads over the wall to sales. In marketing's defense, marketing is often incented and measured based on the quantity of leads generated - not quality. This troubled relationship may be a product of out-of-sync objectives and performance metrics. Aren't we all really just working within our little mazes to find the fastest and easiest way to the cheese? That was a rhetorical question, and the answer is yes.
Lead scoring is considered a way to remedy this issue - at least a way for marketing to generate better quality leads. The lead score is a numeric value built from a couple of types of information - profile and historical activity information. Profile information is information about the contact or the company like title (VP, CEO, CFO, Manager) and industry vertical (technology, financial services, healthcare, etc.) and company size (greater than 1000 employees). Historical activity information includes the contacts past web form responses and even past web site page visits. The historical activity score can increment higher based on each web site visit to a product page or a past request for a white paper or even a specific response to a set of qualifying questions on a web form. When the lead score goes beyond a specified threshold, based on both profile information (best fit) and history (most interest), a lead is generated for the product category of interest.
In theory and in practice if the score is built well, the higher the score then the better qualified the lead. The contacts from the best verticals and departments with the best titles will be scored higher then the contacts from poor verticals, unrelated departments, and with inappropriate titles. Also, the contacts that have answered qualifying questions favorably will be given higher scores then those who did not. Contact that have recently attended a webinar or downloaded a whitepapers, filled out a form, and/or browsed the corporate web site will be score higher than someone whe just filled out a web form.
Challenges to consider when implementing lead scoring
The number of leads generated will initially go down. I will let you in on a little secret regarding scoring leads that my clients are often surprised about when it actually happens. If you currently send most all your marketing responses out as leads to sales, after you implement a lead scoring system the number of leads will go down. It will go down because you went from little to no qualifying criteria to a set of more stringent qualifying rules to build the lead score that must be met before the prospect can qualify. Lead volumes can return to the previous levels if your marketing activity increases to compensate for the tougher qualification.
A previous client was unsuccessful implementing a lead scoring system, but not lead management, because of this issue concerning lead volume decrease. This marketing organization was measured and incented on generating a specific number of leads per campaign and generating a specific volume of leads per quarter. The lead scoring system started to drop these volumes. Because of this drop, the marketing department quickly abandoned the lead scoring system because it did not allow them to meet their metrics for the number of leads generated in a campaign or quarter. Even the sales organization was part to blame here, because sales had become dependent on these higher lead volumes and was staffed to handle a flood of leads. They were also incented, trained, and accustomed to churning quickly through a bunch of suspect leads. So, any drop in lead volumes with an improvement in quality would also mean that sales would have to alter their staffing plans and how their sales team works leads.
How can you manage this? Prepare the organization for the quality of leads to go up and the quantity of leads to go down. Revise target metrics for marketing leads generated down while increasing the quality metric targets up like percent qualified, contacted, interested, opportunities generated, and closed sales. Manage change within the sales organization to start working leads differently to work every lead, spend more time on each lead with more contact attempts and time invested per lead, and provide better notes or information on each lead. Also, make up for the smaller volumes of better qualified leads with sales follow-up calls for marketing campaigns and seminar and event drives.
Lead generation qualification will become more complex. If you are an organization that offers a wide rage of products across numerous categories, lead scoring may be more complex for you to implement. The reason for this is around how you score historical activity. If prospect "Mr. A" downloads a white paper for product Z in category M and then fills out a form expressing an interest in product X in category O, then what will "Mr. A's" lead score be and will a lead be generated for product Z and or category M or for product X and or category O? There is no right answer here - so it depends on your rules. That is what makes lead scoring complex.
To remedy this, generate marketing leads specific to a product or product category, then you will want to track activity like white papers downloaded, demos downloaded, webinars attended to a specific to a product or product category and lead score. In a nutshell, you would not want to generate a lead for sprockets because that was the last web form the prospect filled out after they have been researching widgets for 3 months. They should be contacted regarding widgets.
How can you manage this? If you have a small number of products or product categories, then you can probably build separate historical activity component of the lead score by product or product category. If you have lots of products and a few product categories, then create a few historical activity lead scores by product category. In situations where there is way too many products or product categories, then consider building the historical activity component of the lead score on demand. For example, Mr. A responds to a marketing campaign for product Z. Build the score from Mr. A's profile, from his current web form responses plus add a query to look at historical activity for the same product or product category in the last 30 - 90 days. The historical activity component increases with the amount of recent activity for the same type of product.
Another prositive effect of the ad hoc building of the historical activity score is that the lead is created in the context of a campaign and for a specific product or effort. Lead scoring is often divorced from any specific campaign, because a lead could be generated from activities or responses across many campaigns. This is challenging when you want to report which campaign generates more leads than another. The ad hoc building of the score per campaign still tightly associates the campaign with the response and subsequently the lead while allowing the marketer the capability to impute interest based on past responses for the same or similar products.
Other things you can try first to improve lead quality to sales
First, reduce duplicate leads for the same contact. Aprimo automatically merges duplicates. but many systems treat each response as a separate lead and contact. Buy Aprimo or add a merge and duplicate reduction system to your prospect to lead processing.
Second, make sure all leads have the minimum required contact information. Any leads passed to sales should have some minimum required information like name, email address, and phone number. There is a trade off here, the more information that you require then the lower the response. But the more information that you require, the higher the quality except for bogus entries like Mickey Mouse. At least look at the amount of information provided as an element of the lead score (quality score) with the score going higher as the profile information is fully populated. If you can ask for name and address information and validate the address - that is an even better indicator of quality.
Third, create and use your qualifying questions and definitely score the qualifying questions. If someone says that they have a budget and he or she has to make a decision in 30 days make sure you score this so that these leads are immediately sent to sales. Talk to sales and let them tell you what qualifying question responses should be sent to sales immediately and which ones should be nurtured. Also, when someone says that they are making a decision in 9 months or a year, then send them an email 3 months before that time to see if they would like to talk with a sales professional or change their level of interest.
This last point is going to seem obvious, but hey doesn't most everything I write about here seem obvious after you read it. Fourth, do not create a lead for a prospect's first response. Duh. Unless the individual answers a qualifying question high enough on their first web form, do not send them immediately to sales to become a lead. Look for some minimal level of activity over the last 30 - 90 days. So, make sure the individual has demonstrated a pattern of activity over time that shows they are really interested before creating a lead for that person.
In closing
I can't promise you that if you implement lead scoring or any of the above steps to improve lead quality that the sales people will start inviting you out to their summer homes or boats. However, marketing should take steps to improve lead quality and take the emphasis off of lead quantity. Also, you might be wondering what do you do with all those other prospects that responded but did not qualify to become a lead. Well, these known prospects have provided you with product preference information and contact information for marketing to keep nurturing them until they are ready to talk with sales. Aprimo is designed to maintain these prospects and maintain a dialogue with them until the prospect self-qualifies as a lead. Good hunting.












Technically, my name is Kati Dafoe, and technically, I'm an Associate Events Specialist at Aprimo. I figured before I let too much time go by, I should officially introduce myself, my background and why you should care about what I have to say!
Consider it the dashboard that holds the keys to your marketing success and can drive your marketing engine.

